While compressive strength of concrete can easily be determined in the lab, estimating the strength value for hardened concrete in the field remains a challenge. On-site evaluation of concrete strength is a main challenge in the condition assessment of existing infrastructure. Owners and managers of such facilities prefer non-destructive methods to avoid further damage to an already struggling structure.
What is Compressive Strength of Concrete?
Compressive strength of concrete is determined using the classic compression test. Concrete cylinders or cubes are placed in the compression machine. The stress is gradually increased until the concrete specimen breaks. This is normally considered as the strength of concrete sample. In the design codes, the strength of concrete samples at the age of 28 days after casting is considered as the minimum compressive strength. This is the value that is used for design of new structures.
For existing structures, core samples are taken from the existing elements and tested for compressive strength. This is considered the most reliable method to estimate the compressive strength. However, this method has certain limitations mainly because:
1) It is destructive. Not only it damages concrete integrity, it might affect reinforcing bars in RC structures. Rebar locating tools are needed to avoid this problem.
2) Selecting test locations can be difficult. Selecting the best location of cores is relatively subjective.
3) The locations of cores needs to be repaired.
4) Coring is not an option for owners of important structures, especially when there are concerns about further damaging the structure.
How To Estimate Strength of Concrete Using NDT Methods?
Non-destructive test methods have been developed over the years to estimate the strength of concrete. The following provides a brief review of these test methods, their application and limitation for reliable prediction of concrete strength.
Pull Out Test
The concept behind this method is that the tensile force required to pull a metal disk, together with a layer of concrete, from the surface to which it is attached, is related to the compressive strength of the concrete.The pull out test is normally used for early diagnosis of strength problems. However, it can be used to evaluate the strength of concrete in existing structures. Pull out testing involves attaching a small piece of equipment to the exterior bolt, nut, screw or fixing. This is then pulled to the designated stress load level to determine how strong and secure the fixing is.
Advantages of Pull Out Test
1) Relatively easy to use.
2) If relationship to strength is established, the method can deliver robust test results.
Disadvantages of Pull Out Test
1) It involves crushing and damaging concrete
The methods based on the rebound principle consist of measuring the rebound of a spring driven hammer mass after its impact with concrete. The test has been widely used, since its introduction in 1948. The main reason behind its popularity, is its simplicity, and convenient of use for field applications. Rebound hammer is used to evaluate the surface hardness. Malhotra (2004) argues that “there is little apparent theoretical relationship between the strength of concrete and the rebound number of the hammer. However, within limits, empirical correlations have been established between strength properties and the rebound number.” The test method has been standardized through ASTM C 805. To use this test method to estimate strength, it is necessary to establish a relationship between strength and rebound number for a given concrete and given apparatus. Such relationship can be established by correlating rebound numbers measured on the structure with
the measured strengths of cores taken from corresponding locations.
Advantages of Rebound Hammer
1) It is easy to use for most field applications.
2) The test can be used to study the uniformity of concrete
Disadvantages of Rebound Hammer
1) The method is very subjective
2) surface condition, presence of rebar, presence of sub-surface voids can affect the test results
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV)
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) is an effective method for quality control of concrete materials, and detecting damages in structural components. The UPV methods have been traditionally used for the quality control of materials, mostly homogeneous materials such as metals and welded connections. With the recent advancement in transducer technology, the test has been widely accepted in testing concrete materials. The test procedure has been standardized as “Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete” (ASTM C 597, 2016). The concept behind the technology is measuring the travel time of acoustic waves in a medium, and correlating them to the elastic properties and density of the material. Travel time of ultrasonic waves reflects internal condition of test area. Some researchers have tried to develop a relationship between the strength and wave speed. Read More About UPV Method
Advantages of UPV
1) UPV can be used to detect other sub-surface deficiencies
Disadvantages of UPV
1) The method is affected by presence of rebar, voids, and cracks.
2) There is no enough results for assessing the reliability of the method in the field.
5- Combined Methods
Combined methods involves a combination of NDT methods for predicting the on-site strength of concrete. The combination of UPV and Rebound hammer has been studied by several researcher. The combined methods often deliver more comprehensive results. The improvement of the accuracy of the strength prediction according is achieved by the use of correction factors taking into account the influence of cement type, cement content, petrologic aggregate type, fine aggregate fraction, and aggregate maximum size. The accuracy of the combination of rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity results in improved accuracy in estimating the compressive strength of concrete (Hannachi and Guetteche, 2012)
Sign up to our Newsletter and receive the latest blog posts from our knowledge centre, and updates on our novel technologies.
There is one more way of obtaining the compressive strength of concrete in place.
The tried and true method, measure the resistance to force and plot deformation vs. load.
I have determined the best penetration load head is as described in ACI SP-82 “Point load test” by PJ Robbins. A load cell measures the force produced by a hydraulic ram and a sensor that measures the displacement of the load head as load is applied, completes all that is needed to plot the secant modulus.. Can be used in any void where there are two opposite faces; blockouts for plumbing, electrical, fire risers or 4 inch core sample holes.
Dale H. Fietz P.E., M. ASCE
I love what you mentioned about combined methods and how they involving using NDT methods to predict concrete strength. Non-destructive testing is convenient because you receive accurate data without letting anything go to waste. If I were to need such services, I would make sure to contact a company in town that can perform non-destructive testing in a timely manner.
Thanks for the information you have cleared my doubts. Pls send me the standard speed of waves on plain concrete’s. Thanks
Pingback: 5 Methods for On-Site Evaluation of Concrete Strength | FPrimeC Solutions
You have made some decent points there. I checked on the web to learn more about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this web site.|
We can’t do exact calculations in these tests but we can get the approximate quantity but the problem still exists. How can we find economic tests without this test?
These devices are expensive and are not available everywhere.