The following article is a quick review of the most cost-effective and easy to implement non-destructive testing for detailed bridge condition survey.
We were recently involved in a detailed bridge deck condition survey in Perth, Ontario. The main objective was to inspect and evaluate the existing condition of the bridge deck, identify surface and subsurface defects, and evaluate the corrosion activity. As one might expect, the scope of project leaves little room for creativity and innovation. Concrete sawing and coring has long become market standards, and it looks quite impossible to bring any change. Half-Cell corrosion potential mapping and ground penetrating radar (for rebar locate) were the only NDT methods involved. As we were trying to deliver the scope of the project, I was thinking how things can be improved through a cost-effective and timely framework.
Non-Destructive Testing for Detailed Bridge Condition Survey.
The Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) has identified various NDE techniques for condition survey for of bridge decks. The report ranks these methods based on their effectiveness in detection and characterization of four major deterioration types: delamination, concrete degradation, reinforcement corrosion, and vertical cracking. SHRP 2 useful review of some of the NDT methods such as the ground penetrating radar (GPR), impact echo (IE), ultrasonic surface waves (USW), half-cell potential (HCP), electrical resistivity (ER), and chain drag/hammer sounding for bridge deck evaluation.
Main Challenges in Bridge Condition Survey
In most bridge deck condition survey projects, the contractor/consultant is asked to provide the following information about the bridge deck:
- Visual Inspection and Sounding (Learn more)
- Thickness of Concrete Deck
- Cover thickness
- Concrete Cutting/Sawing
- Extract Concrete Cores
- Inspect condition of steel rebar and concrete
- Corrosion inspection and monitoring
- Compressive Strength
- Chloride Content (Chloride at steel rebar level)
- Air content
Except for corrosion inspection, where half-cell corrosion potential mapping has become market standard, application of NDT in other areas are very limited. The following discusses how different NDT methods can be utilized to provide information about some of these parameters.
Visual Inspection and Chain Dragging
Chain dragging or hammer sounding is still one of the most popular tests. The main reason behind their wide use is its simplicity, and cost. No special equipment is needed. However, the application of the method for detecting delaminated area can be limited when the background noise (from the traffic) is too high.
Most recent developments in this area is the use of advanced acoustic sensor to collect the hollow sound at the traffic speed. Ground Penetrating Radar is another promising non-destructive alternative for this purpose. The main advantage of these methods is that they do not need special traffic control or lane closure.
Thickness of Concrete Deck
Extracting through the thickness concrete core (full depth) is used to evaluate the total thickness of the concrete deck. While this is important in evaluating the dead load of the bridge deck, the procedure provide limited information. For bridge inspections that Bridge Master is not used, access to the underneath of the deck is often limited and extracting full depth core is challenging.
As an alternative, Non-Destructive Test method such as Ultrasonic Pulse Echo can be used to evaluate the thickness of the bridge deck. While the accuracy of the test method in areas with dense rebar spacing is limited, the results from the Mid-Span are accurate. Impact-Echo is another great NDT tool for evaluating the thickness of concrete decks.
Concrete Cover Thickness
Evaluating concrete cover thickness using Non-destructive test method is already a market standard. The test results can be verified at the location of concrete sawing. Most modern Ground Penetrating Radar devices can provide a good estimate of the rebar depth. Assuming that the rebar depth is not going to change over time (unless there is a major intervention), application of NDT can significantly reduce the number and areas that need to be uncovered for this purpose.
Concrete cores are often extracted to study the mechanical and durability properties of concrete. Cores can be tested to provide information about the compressive strength. They can also be tested for chloride content and air content. While the total number of concrete cores can be quite significant for larger bridge decks, a few of these cores are further studied for strength or chloride content. Some of the most common challenges of concrete coring is summarized here.
When it comes to concrete strength, combined NDT methods can be used. A combination of rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity can help engineers estimate the strength of concrete. The method can help reduce the number of cores that are needed for this purpose.
Concrete Chloride Content
Chloride and air content are the only tests that cannot be determined through NDT at this time; However, the use of surface electrical resistivity can enhance our understanding of the bridge deck condition.
Corrosion Inspection and Monitoring
Corrosion inspection in concrete bridge deck is mainly done through Half-Cell Corrosion Potential Survey (ASTM C 876). Half-cell test provides valuable information about the likelihood of corrosion activity in concrete bridge decks. However, the results can be inconclusive for epoxy coated rebar, decks with asphalt overlays, and decks with waterproofing membrane.
Another important test can be corrosion rate monitoring. This is very useful in evaluating the service life of the bridge structure. Surface electrical resistivity can also help engineers in getting useful information about the concrete quality.
Most of the tests that are currently included in most bridge deck condition surveys can be replaced or complemented with commercially available NDT solutions in the market. Most NDT solutions can deliver results with same or higher accuracy, while reducing the inspection timeline, intervention in the structure, and reducing the damage to critical elements. Application of different Non-destructive testing for detailed bridge condition survey has been studies by many researchers and engineers. With the recent advancements in sensor technology, and wireless communication, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) solutions are becoming more cost-effective for general applications, and can help engineers and owners in near future.
Prepared by Hamed Layssi, PhD, PEng